Don’t Leave Money on the Table: How to File Your Claim in the Anthropic AI Copyright Settlement - DEADLINE March 31, 2026

If you’re a writer, author, or publisher whose work may have been used to train AI systems, you have 9 days left to file a claim in the Anthropic v. Bartz AI copyright lawsuit settlement. The deadline is March 31, 2026, and if you don’t file, you won’t get paid.

(h/t to Courtney Milan who wrote about this on Bluesky (@courtneymilan.com) today and put me on notice. ~ Danny)

Here’s what you need to know and how to file your claim before time runs out.

What’s at Stake?

As of March 20th, claims have been filed for 264,809 works. Based on current calculations, the settlement amount per work is estimated between $3,100 and $4,456 (divided between author and publisher if both file claims).

However, there’s an important caveat: Anthropic is paying the settlement in portions, with the final payment due in late 2027. Given current economic uncertainties, there’s no guarantee the full amount will be paid.

Critical Information for Authors AND Publishers

Here’s something many people don’t realize: If you’re an author and your publisher files a claim but you don’t, you won’t get your share. The publisher doesn’t automatically receive your portion to remit to you—your share simply disappears.

Similarly, if you’re a publisher and the author doesn’t file, you won’t receive their portion either. Both parties must file independently to receive their respective shares.

This means the actual payout per work could be higher than estimated, since many works likely have only one party (author or publisher) filing claims.

How to File Your Claim: Step-by-Step

Filing is straightforward, but you must act before March 30, 2026.

Step 1: Check If Your Work Is Eligible

Go to www.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com and use the Works List Lookup tool. You can search by:

• Author name

• Book title

• Publisher name

• ISBN number

• ASIN number

If your work appears in the database, you’re eligible to file a claim. If it doesn’t appear, see the FAQ below about eligibility requirements. (I looked up my work published by Tuttle Publishing, Mixed Martial Arts Fighting Techniques, to see if I was eligible to file a claim and, alas, they didn’t use it so I can’t file a claim… I’m wondering now, “should I take that as a diss?” 🤔 ~ Danny)

Step 2: Verify Your Rights

Determine your status:

• Legal Owner: Typically the publisher who holds the exclusive right to reproduce the work in the U.S.

• Beneficial Owner: Typically the author who assigned copyright in exchange for royalties

Both legal and beneficial owners should file separate claims for the same work.

Step 3: Gather Your Information

Before starting, have ready:

• Details about your copyrighted work(s) (title, ISBN, publication date)

• Your contact information

• Information about other rightsholders (if you’re an author, you’ll need publisher info; if you’re a publisher, you’ll need author info)

• Your preferred payment method

Step 4: Complete the Claim Form Online

Visit www.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com and submit your claim form online (recommended for faster processing). You can also download a form to complete and return by mail.

If you have multiple eligible works, you can file claims for all of them on a single form.

Step 5: Submit Before the Deadline

Ensure your claim is submitted by March 30, 2026. Late claims will not be accepted.

Step 6: Contact Your Co-Rightsholders

If you’re a publisher: Reach out to your authors immediately. Make sure they understand they need to file separately to receive their share. Provide them with the settlement website and deadline information.

If you’re an author: Contact your publisher to confirm they’re also filing. If your publisher doesn’t file, you’ll still get your 50% share—but only if you file your own claim.

Step 7: Confirm Submission

Keep a record of your submission confirmation for your records.

Important Reminders

• If you have not opted out by now, you are automatically opted in. Your claims will be extinguished by this settlement whether you file or not.

• Filing a claim is the only way to receive payment. There is no automatic distribution.

• Both authors and publishers must file independently to receive their respective shares.

• The default split is 50-50 between author and publisher, though you can claim an alternative split when submitting your form.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What if I search and my work isn’t listed in the database?
A: If your work doesn’t appear in the Works List Lookup tool, you cannot file a claim in this settlement (like me, 😢 😭 ~ Danny). The settlement only covers works that meet ALL of these criteria:

• Registered with the U.S. Copyright Office (formal registration, not just automatic copyright)

• Have an ISBN

• Appear on the pirate sites LibGen (Library Genesis) and/or PiLiMi (Pirate Library Mirror), which Anthropic used for training data

If your work doesn’t meet these requirements, it’s not part of this settlement class. (😡 ~ Danny)

Q: My work was used by Anthropic but isn’t on the list. Do I have any recourse?
A: Possibly. If you believe your work was used to train AI systems but doesn’t meet the settlement criteria, you may still have individual legal claims outside this settlement. Contact an intellectual property attorney to discuss your options.

Q: What if my copyright was never registered?
A: Unfortunately, unregistered works are not covered by this settlement. However, if your work was published within the last five years, you can still register the copyright at www.copyright.gov/registration/. This won’t help with this particular settlement, but it will protect your rights going forward and is required before you can file an infringement lawsuit.

Q: Can I file for multiple works?
A: Yes. You should file a claim for each work you hold rights to, but you can submit all claims on a single form.

Q: What if I commissioned a translation or other derivative work?
A: Both the original rights holder and the creator of the derivative work (like a translator) may have separate claims and should both file independently.

Q: When will I receive payment?
A: The earliest anticipated payment date is August 2026 if there are no objections to the settlement. However, Anthropic’s payment schedule extends through late 2027, so full payment may take longer.

Q: What happens if I miss the deadline?
A: You will not receive any settlement payment, and your claims will still be extinguished by the settlement. There are no extensions.

Q: How much will I actually receive?
A: The exact amount won’t be known until after the claims period closes and a full accounting is completed. Current estimates range from $3,100 to $4,456 per work. This amount is split 50-50 between author and publisher (if both file). If only one party files, they receive only their 50% share—the other 50% is not distributed.

Q: What if I don’t have my publishing contract?
A: The settlement presumes a default 50-50 split between authors and publishers. If you don’t have documentation showing a different split, the default will apply. Try to obtain a copy of your contract from your publisher if possible.

Q: Do I need a lawyer to file a claim?
A: No. The claims process is designed to be completed by individual rightsholders. However, if you have questions or concerns about your rights, consulting with an IP attorney is always advisable.

Q: What if I’m not in the United States?
A: You can still file a claim if your work meets the eligibility criteria. The settlement covers all copyright owners, regardless of location. You may need assistance from someone in the U.S. to help you navigate the process.

Don’t Wait—File Now

With only 9 days remaining, don’t risk leaving money on the table. It’s super easy to do and your quest may end in the search stage like mine did. 😔 But still you could be different. So, visit www.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com today to search for your work and file your claim.

If you need assistance with the claims process or have questions about your intellectual property rights, professional legal guidance can make all the difference, so the rest of this article is for you 👇

*******

🎬 Let Me Help You Protect Your Creative Rights 🎬

Navigating copyright law, AI litigation, and intellectual property protection can be complex. Whether you’re dealing with settlement claims, contract negotiations, or protecting your creative works, I’m here to help. As an experienced IP attorney, I can guide you through these processes and ensure your rights are fully protected. Contact me to discuss how we can safeguard your rights and maximize the value of your intellectual property:

www.djimlaw.com/contactme

Lights, Camera, Legal Action: How Filmmakers Shield Their Documentaries from Big-Name Lawsuits

Picture this: You're a filmmaker with a hot story about a famous billionaire, but you're worried he might sue you for telling it. Sound familiar? That's exactly what's happening with "Tesla Files," a new documentary about Elon Musk's jump into politics as reported in Variety.

A provocative documentary titled "Tesla Files" is set to expose the alleged dangers of Elon Musk's growing political influence. Produced by Germany's Beetz Brothers and directed by Andreas Pichler, the film draws from 100GB of leaked internal data provided by a former Tesla employee, Lukasz Krupski. The documentary explores Musk's transformation from tech entrepreneur to political strategist, shares personal stories of victims affected by Tesla's autopilot technology, and investigates alleged cover-ups and regulatory evasion. With Musk's recent appointment as Senior Advisor to the president, the film aims to scrutinize the potential consequences of his expanded influence on government policies. "Tesla Files" will be previewed as a work-in-progress at the CPH:DOX international documentary festival in Copenhagen, promising a timely examination of the intersection between technology, politics, and corporate power.

I don’t know what will happen next and if Musk will sue but this story seems like a perfect example of the legal tightrope documentary makers walk when they tackle powerful subjects. So let’s break down the "Tesla Files" situation in a way that's easy to understand, even if you're not a law expert. We'll look at:

1. What kind of legal trouble the filmmakers might face

2. How they can protect themselves

3. Why this matters to anyone who wants to make documentaries or tell important stories

Whether you're dreaming of making your own documentaries someday or just curious about how the pros do it, this guide will give you the inside scoop on keeping your film legally safe while still telling the truth. Let's dive in and see how filmmakers can stand up to even the biggest names in the world!

What If? Musk vs. "Tesla Files"

Imagine you're in the filmmaker's shoes. You've got this explosive story about Elon Musk, but you know he's got an army of lawyers. What could he throw at you? Here are the main legal “punches” or claims Musk might try to throw at these filmmakers (in the United States, specifically):

1. Defamation

This is the big one. If Musk thinks the film is telling lies that hurt his reputation, he could sue for defamation. As it stands, the documentary aims to "expose the alleged danger of Elon Musk's political influence" and questions his motives for entering politics. Musk will likely claim that it contains false statements that harm Musk's reputation.

Key elements Musk would need to prove defamation:

• a) False statements of fact (not opinion)

• b) Publication to third parties

• c) Fault amounting to at least negligence

• d) Harm to reputation

2. Invasion of Privacy

If the documentary uses private information or footage without consent, Musk could claim invasion of privacy. This is particularly relevant given the film's use of leaked internal data.

3. Breach of Confidentiality

Basically, spilling the tea without permission. The documentary relies on information from whistleblowers and leaked data. Musk could argue that these sources breached confidentiality agreements, and the filmmakers induced or benefited from these breaches.

4. Copyright Infringement

If the documentary uses Tesla's proprietary materials without permission, Musk could pursue copyright claims.

5. Tortious Interference

If the film hurts Tesla’s reputation, Musk might claim the documentary interferes with Tesla's business relationships by damaging the company's reputation.

Filmmakers' Defense Playbook

Now, how would the filmmakers avoid getting knocked out by these legal punches? Here's their game plan:

1. Truth

The most robust defense against defamation is truth. If the filmmakers can prove their statements are substantially true, they have a strong defense.

2. Fair Report Privilege

If the documentary accurately reports on official government proceedings or documents related to investigations into Tesla or Musk, they may be protected by the fair report privilege.

3. Opinion and Rhetorical Hyperbole

Statements of opinion or rhetorical hyperbole are generally protected from defamation claims. The filmmakers could argue that certain statements are clearly opinion or not meant to be taken as literal fact.

4. Public Figure Doctrine

As a public figure, Musk would need to prove "actual malice" - that the filmmakers knew their statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. It’s harder to do than it sounds so this higher standard provides significant protection for the filmmakers.

5. Newsworthiness and Public Interest

Courts often provide broader protections for speech on matters of public concern. The filmmakers could argue that Musk's political influence and Tesla's business practices are newsworthy topics of significant public interest.

6. First Amendment Protection

The filmmakers can invoke their First Amendment rights to free speech and press, which courts generally interpret broadly, especially for documentaries on public issues.

7. Journalistic Practices

By adhering to rigorous journalistic standards, including fact-checking, seeking multiple sources, and offering Musk an opportunity to respond, the filmmakers can strengthen their defense against defamation claims.

How Filmmakers Should Protect Themselves and their work

So, you want to make sure your hard work doesn't get shut down by a lawsuit? Here's how filmmakers, like you, can protect themselves:

1. Double-Check Everything

Implement a rigorous fact-checking process to verify all claims made in the documentary. Document sources and maintain detailed records of research and interviews.

2. Get a Legal Look

Have experienced media attorneys look at it and prepare a comprehensive pre-release risk assessment to identify and address potential legal issues.

3. Fair and Balanced Reporting

Strive for a fair and accurate portrayal of events and individuals. Include multiple perspectives and offer Musk and Tesla representatives opportunities to respond to allegations.

4. Provide Clear Disclaimers

Use clear disclaimers (or label your opinions) to distinguish between factual statements and opinions or speculation.

5. Get Permission

Obtain proper releases and consent from all individuals featured in the documentary, especially for any sensitive or potentially private information.

6. Protect Your Sources

Implement strong measures to protect confidential sources, including whistleblowers, to avoid potential legal issues related to breaches of confidentiality.

7. Watch Out For Copyrights

Ensure all materials used in the documentary are either original, properly licensed, or fall under fair use doctrine.

8. Get Insurance

Obtain errors and omissions (E&O) insurance to provide financial protection in case of legal action.

Why This Matters

Understanding all this legal stuff isn't just for big-time filmmakers. It's important for anyone who wants to tell true stories, whether it's through videos, writing, or even social media. Knowing how to protect yourself while speaking truth to power is a skill that's becoming more important every day.

The "Tesla Files" case shows us that even when you're up against one of the most powerful people in the world, you can still tell important stories. By following these guidelines, filmmakers (and maybe you someday!) can shine a light on important issues without fear.

---

🎥 Ready to Safeguard Your FILMMAKING Masterpiece? 🎥

Don't let legal complexities cut your film short. As a seasoned entertainment attorney, I'm here to empower your vision and shield your cinematic labors.

🔹 Schedule a Strategy Session: Let's dissect your project's unique challenges and craft an ironclad legal strategy. Click HERE to schedule a session.

🔹 Fortify Your Film: Ensure your film is armored against industry pitfalls, from copyright issues to defamation claims.

🔹 Master the Art of Negotiation: Arm yourself with expert advice for distribution deals, licensing agreements, and more.

Remember, in the world of filmmaking, your greatest ally is a knowledgeable legal partner. Don't leave your artistic legacy to chance. Your film deserves more than just to be made; it deserves to make waves.

Actionable Tips for TV and Filmmaking Clients: Lessons from "The Pitt" Lawsuit

The recent legal battle between Warner Bros. Television and Michael Crichton's estate over "The Pitt" offers valuable insights for writers, tv show creators, and producers. Here are key takeaways and actionable tips:

• Protect Your Intellectual Property

Tip: Always keep in mind the need to secure comprehensive rights agreements that cover potential FUTURE productions, spin-offs, or reboots.

The Crichton estate's "frozen rights" provision demonstrates the importance of forward-thinking contracts. Ensure your agreements include clauses that protect your creative works from unauthorized adaptations or derivatives.

• Be Wary of Look-Alike Productions

Tip: Monitor or hire a lawyer or company to monitor industry developments closely for potential infringements on your intellectual property.

The similarities between "ER" and "The Pitt" raised red flags. Stay vigilant about new productions that bear striking resemblances to your work, especially when they involve the same creative team or network.

• Document All Negotiations

Tip: Maintain detailed records of all discussions, offers, and agreements related to your intellectual property.

The court noted the "timeline of various communications and events" in this case. Thorough documentation can be crucial evidence if legal disputes arise.

• Be Prepared for Anti-SLAPP Motions

Tip: Ensure your claims are well-substantiated before filing a lawsuit to withstand potential dismissal attempts.

Warner Bros. tried to dismiss the lawsuit on free speech grounds, likely through an anti-SLAPP motion. Build a strong case that can survive such challenges.

• Stay Informed About Industry Practices

Tip: Keep abreast of how studios and networks are handling reboots, revivals, and spin-offs of popular franchises.

Understanding current trends in how intellectual property is being leveraged can help you anticipate potential issues and negotiate more effectively.

• Be Cautious of Repackaging Attempts

Tip: Watch for attempts to circumvent your rights by repackaging familiar concepts under new names.

The alleged "pattern of conduct" by the studio to circumvent Crichton's rights serves as a warning. Be alert to subtle attempts to exploit your intellectual property.

By watching industry practices, studying cases like this, and implementing these actionable tips, tv and filmmaking clients can better protect their creative works, navigate complex negotiations, and maintain control over their intellectual property in an ever-evolving industry landscape.

The entertainment industry is a complex labyrinth of legal challenges, but you don't have to navigate it alone. ---

🎬 Ready to Protect Your Creative Legacy? 🎬

Don't let legal complexities dim your spotlight. As an entertainment law expert, I'm here to empower your vision and shield your artistic endeavors.

🔹 Schedule a Consultation: Let's discuss your unique challenges and craft a bespoke legal strategy. Click HERE to get started.

🔹 Protect Your IP: Ensure your creative works are fortified against industry pitfalls.

🔹 Navigate Negotiations: Arm yourself with expert advice for your next big deal.

---

8 Things to Know Before You Use a Non-Compete Agreement

When a valuable employee leaves an employer to start their own business or to work for a competitor, that employer may feel vulnerable to losing customers or trade secrets. That is why many employers make employees sign non-compete agreements. However, in New York and many other states, non-competes must be properly drafted or they will not be enforced. As a general rule, employers need to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. For a non-compete to be effective it must be properly drafted taking into account the particular facts and scenarios between the employer and the employee such as the employer’s business, the employee’s role within the employer’s business, and the type of information the employee has access to.

To be enforceable, the non-compete must contain the 8 elements I describe in the infographic below.

Feel free to download a PDF version HERE.

For a strong agreement, you may also want to add the following provisions to a non-compete:

• a non-solicitation of employees;

• a non-solicitation of customers or clients;

• a confidentiality provision;

• a tolling provision to suspend the start date for the restrictive period after the employee has breached the agreement or is in litigation over it;

• a garden leave provision;

• a notice that the employee provides a unique, special, or extraordinary set of services;

• a specification that the non-compete applies after termination of employment for any reason; and

• a notice of immunity under the Defend Trade Secrets Act.

Feel free to consult me for guidance on drafting or reviewing your non-compete agreements and all other types of contracts and agreements at www.djimlaw.com/contact-me. If you enjoy this kind of information, advice, and news, then subscribe too.