The Northern District of California has fired the opening salvos in what promises to be a protracted legal war over AI training data. Two judges reached similar conclusions but through dramatically different reasoning—creating a complex legal landscape that every copyright creator should pay attention to.
What makes these cases particularly fascinating? Even though there were findings of fair use in both cases, “[m]uch of the press coverage has treated these holdings as sweeping endorsements of fair use, but each ruling is narrow and fact-specific.“ Judge Chhabria, presiding over the Kadrey vs. Meta case, even stated bluntly that "in most cases," training LLMs on copyrighted works without permission is likely infringing and not fair use. Yet he still ruled for Meta because the plaintiffs "made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record."
These rulings highlight three critical battlefronts that will determine the future of creative compensation:
• Evidence of AI outputs that replicate original works
• The emerging concept of "indirect substitution" market harm
• The unprecedented ability of AI to "flood the market" with competing content
To read the full analysis, click here: Fair Use and AI Training - Two Recent Decisions Highlight the Complexity of This Issue
*******
YOUR TAKE: THE FAIR USE DEBATE
Where do you stand on AI training with copyrighted materials? (post your answer in the comments below and state why)
It's clearly fair use - no compensation needed
LLMs should pay standard licensing fees (normal book price)
LLMs should pay higher premium rates reflecting potential market impact
*******
NAVIGATE THE AI FRONTIER - CREATORS ON BOTH SIDES
As courts refine these precedents, creative professionals face unprecedented challenges whether protecting original works or incorporating AI into their creative process. Strategic legal guidance is essential in this rapidly evolving landscape.
My practice serves creators across the AI spectrum:
For traditional creators: I develop tactical approaches to document potential infringement, structure rights agreements that account for emerging technologies, and create licensing strategies that protect your market position against algorithmic competition.
For AI-assisted creators: I guide you through the ethical and legal complexities of AI-generated content, establish workflows that maximize your copyright ownership, and help you create documentation trails that validate your rights to AI-assisted works.
Don't navigate these complex waters alone. The legal strategies you implement today will determine whether you can confidently claim, defend, and monetize your creative output tomorrow.
Schedule a consultation at https://www.djimlaw.com/contact to develop your customized AI strategy - whether you're protecting your work from AI or incorporating AI into your creative process.